Nuclear Energy Institute issued the following statement from Vice President and General Counsel Ellen Ginsberg after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on March 18, denied the U.S. Department of Energy‘s request that the original panel and the entire court review the November 2013 decision in NARUC v. DOE. In that decision, the D.C. Circuit held that the department could not continue to collect the one-tenth of a cent per kilowatt-hour surcharge to pay for used nuclear fuel management. In the lawsuit, NEI and National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners asserted that DOE’s termination of the Yucca Mountain repository program and the absence of a congressionally approved alternative to Yucca Mountain prevented DOE from determining whether an appropriate fee was being collected because there is no program to be evaluated. In a unanimous decision, D.C. Circuit Senior Judge Silberman wrote that, “Because the secretary is apparently unable to conduct a legally adequate fee assessment, the secretary is ordered to submit to Congress a proposal to change the [nuclear waste] fee to zero until such time as either the secretary chooses to comply with the (Nuclear Waste Policy) Act as it is currently written, or until Congress enacts an alternative waste management plan.”
“Today’s decision rejecting DOE’s efforts to reopen its fight to collect fees for a program that the department unilaterally terminated is both appropriate and timely. DOE has already submitted to Congress the required proposal to adjust the fee to zero. If Congress does not act within the 90-day period during which the proposal is pending before it, the fee will be reset to zero, relieving consumers of nuclear-generated electricity of the burden of paying for a program that DOE illegally terminated.
“Nuclear energy generators are very pleased that their consumers will not have to pay the fee while no program is under way. However, the industry is extremely eager for the government to meet its legal obligation to dispose of used nuclear fuel. On-site storage is safe and can be maintained without any environmental impact. But that does not in any way excuse the federal government’s failure to meet its commitment to generators, states, local governments and the public to remove used fuel to a NRC-licensed disposal facility.
“Once the Energy Department’s Yucca Mountain repository program is restarted or another waste disposal program is enacted by Congress, DOE then will be able to evaluate the projected costs of the program to determine whether additional funds will be required. Currently, the Nuclear Waste Fund has approximately $34 billion remaining and annual interest income is accruing at the rate of about $1.3 billion.” Ellen Ginsberg, Vice President and General Counsel, NEI
The Nuclear Energy Institute is the nuclear energy industry’s policy organization. This news release and additional information about nuclear energy are available at www.nei.org.
In addition, The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) President Colette D. Honorable of Arkansas issued the following statement in response to the courts rejection of the petition:
“This decision is a big win for consumers of nuclear power. Once again, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has sent another strong signal to the federal government: Stop charging consumers of nuclear power for the stalled Yucca Mountain, Nev., nuclear-waste repository program. While the debate over the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain will continue, consumers should not be forced to pay for a program that is, at best, in hiatus. We stand ready to work with Congress and the federal government so we can restart this vital program.” Colette D. Honorable, NARUC president.