Exelon Op-Ed: States drive carbon policy forward by electrifying transportation sector

Over half of our nation’s car­bon emissions are produced by the electricity and trans­portation sectors.

In the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, nine states have worked collaboratively to reduce emissions in generation through the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, now in its 10th year. With a modest impact on consumer bills, RGGI has raised well over $2 billion to invest in energy efficiency, clean energy, and other programs, produced net eco­nomic benefits of $4 billion, created 44,000 jobs, and reduced emissions by over 50 percent.

A number of states are looking to build on RGGI’s success through a first-of-its kind emissions allow­ance program for transportation, responsible for over 40 percent of carbon emissions in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic. Col­laborating through the Transportation Climate Initiative, the states include Connecticut, Dela­ware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. New York is actively participat­ing and might officially join later this year.

TCI states could raise a mean­ingful amount of revenue for in­vestment in clean transportation by requiring wholesale gasoline and diesel distributors to purchase al­lowances for the embedded emis­sions of the vehicle fuels they sell in participating states. Even a mini­mal fee in line with natural price variability would raise a significant amount. As with RGGI, these tar­geted investments could reduce emissions through investments ac­celerating deployment of electric vehicles and supporting infrastruc­ture as well as electrifying public transit and other fleets, such as school buses.

Of course, the cost-effectiveness of the TCI program, like RGGI, will depend on how the resulting funds are invested. The regional program’s cap-and-invest structure resulted in economic benefits that well exceed­ed costs, even before accounting for the significant health and climate benefits of the emissions reductions themselves. A cost-effective program will ensure maximum investment where it is needed the most. Given the scale of the climate challenge, every dollar must be spent wisely to leverage further investment in safe, reliable, and clean transportation for everyone.

Such investments would (and should) vary according to local needs; a notable characteristic of the TCI program is the flexibility it provides for each jurisdiction to focus on programs with the greatest need by the public. Proceeds could be used, for exam­ple, on transit and other fleets that bring clean transportation options to low-income and other marginalized communities that may be less able to purchase personal EVs. Further, by cleaning up bus and other depots that tend to concentrate in low-in­come communities, TCI could have an amplified benefit by improving local air quality. The initiative repre­sents the all-too-rare instance where disadvantaged communities may re­alize a meaningful share of benefits from clean energy investments.

During 2019, the TCI juris­dictions will dig into policy de­sign, including the identification of regulated entities and fuels and the development of emissions cap levels, monitoring and reporting guidelines, and cost containment and compliance flexibility mecha­nisms. As with the implementation of RGGI, reaching consensus on many of these issues will be chal­lenging, but is critically important for the region. Given the continued lack of federal action on climate is­sues, the leadership of the states in pursuing innovative emissions reductions programs like TCI and RGGI is essential in the fight to protect our environment.

TCI and RGGI are notable for another reason: they are examples of states coming together on a regional basis to address a problem. Like elec­trons in the power grid, people using the nation’s transportation infrastruc­ture cross local and state lines with­out regard to boundaries. Indeed, the very purpose of a vibrant transporta­tion system is to allow the smooth movement of people and goods across large areas. A system wherein multiple modes of clean transporta­tion “work” across state boundaries is just as essential as a reliable, resilient, and clean power system.

It is exciting to see states bring to the transportation sector the creativ­ity they have used to achieve emis­sions reductions in the electricity sector. As other jurisdictions con­sider opportunities to address our climate challenges, they should look to the regional, market-based ap­proaches being used in the North­east and Mid-Atlantic states – vi­brant examples of how to do things right.

About the author: Kathleen Barrón is senior vice president, government & regulatory affairs & public policy, at Exelon Corp.


Previous articleGermans pessimistic on energiewende success
Next articleNext-Gen Grid Architecture Part 3: A peek into industry structure
The Clarion Energy Content Team is made up of editors from various publications, including POWERGRID International, Power Engineering, Renewable Energy World, Hydro Review, Smart Energy International, and Power Engineering International. Contact the content lead for this publication at Jennifer.Runyon@ClarionEvents.com.

No posts to display