In general, commercial lenders are hesitant to provide financing for such projects until the technology is more fully proven, and other financing options can be considerably more expensive. If insurance products were able to significantly limit the exposure of lenders and other financiers to technology performance risk, total project costs could fall by as much as 10 to 20 percent. These instruments would reassure investors by providing for cost recovery even if a new technology’s commercial deployment performs below expectations.
“To meet this nation’s energy challenges, business and government must eliminate obstacles for technology to progress from the lab to the real world,” said Ambassador John Bohn, CalCEF director and former CPUC commissioner. “CalCEF’s proposal can mitigate a significant barrier faced by transformative energy innovations.”
Some of the approaches to market development described in the new white paper are:
- Educate insurance providers about risk transfer needs through the creation of a clean energy insurance coalition comprising business and engineering professionals from across renewable energy technologies.
- Improve underwriting data through new information service providers that aggregate energy equipment and system performance data to help insurance underwriters assess the distribution of performance outcomes and failure rates.
- Create new primary insurers, managing general agents (MGA) and reinsurers, employing professionals from energy, engineering, underwriting and actuarial disciplines to bridge the gap between the renewable energy industry’s risk transfer needs and insurance industry capital.
“Some people compare the current energy transformation to the space race, and indeed there are parallel precedents in the market for risk—insurance for satellite launch and for nuclear power plants are but two examples,” said Rob Robideaux, senior vice president at Marsh Private Equity and M&A Services. “By more accurately evaluating and pricing the performance risks of emerging technologies, we can encourage innovation, tackle major energy challenges and develop a profitable new insurance practice area.”
CalCEF recommends federal and state public policies that promote technology efficacy insurance as part of an integrated technology deployment strategy. Such policies would support commercial approaches, aiding achievement of many states’ renewable portfolio standards and other near-term clean energy goals. The creation of an insurance program by the Department of Energy (DOE) has the potential for the broadest impact. This highly effective mechanism would provide financial support broadly across the clean energy industry, which reduces private capital providers’ exposure to technology risk and bridges the project financing gap. In addition to its direct benefits, a DOE-supported reinsurer would create an environment in which the private solutions described above are more likely to develop.
This new white paper follows “From Innovation to Infrastructure: Financing First Commercial Clean Energy Projects,” in which CalCEF described a “valley of death” faced by new energy technologies transitioning from demonstration to commercial operation. That 2010 paper proposed a range of policy and private sector solutions, including technology performance (or efficacy) insurance, on which this latest edition focuses.
CalCEF works to promote the transition to a clean energy economy by creating institutions and investment vehicles that grow markets for clean energy technologies. CalCEF is a nonprofit umbrella organization that pursues statewide and national agendas via two affiliated entities governed by separate boards of directors comprised of prominent policy makers, scientists, entrepreneurs, and financial professionals. CalCEF Innovations, a 501(c)(3), leads CalCEF’s analysis and product development, designing real-world solutions—market strategies, business models, and public policies—that rapidly advance clean energy adoption. The California Clean Energy Fund, a 501(c)(4), executes and scales the CalCEF investment strategy via a fund-of-funds model, partnering with leading investment managers.